The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is innocent.

1. The defense counsel in the summary of the grounds for appeal asserted that the facts charged in the instant case did not have any normative power because the standards for approval of the National Institute of National Science and Technology were not publicly notified on October 21, 2015. However, the lower court’s excessive interpretation of this part of the legal principles constitutes grounds for ex officio destruction, and thus, the following is examined at the following separate levels.

The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. Ex officio determination

A. In order to transplant fishery resources to be brought in from a foreign country, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case must obtain approval for transplantation from the National Institute of Fisheries.

The defendant shall operate D fisheries in Jeonnam-do C, and shall import and distribute uniforms from foreign countries, such as China and Japan.

On February 2, 2012, the Defendant received a proposal from the operator G of the F corporation, the operator of the Jeonnam Navy E, which was the operator of the Jeonnam Navy E, to transplant the laun uniform in the above laun uniform in Japan and to produce the laun. Accordingly, upon the import of the laun uniform in Japan, the Defendant respondeded to the proposal to sell the laun uniform.

On February 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received contact from the above D Fisheries Office to which Japan’s Cdab uniform was imported; and (b) received 10kg of Japan’s Cdab uniform 1670,000 from the Defendant imported for food and sold it; and (c) the G received 10kg of Japan’s Cdab uniform 10k from the same day to the above D Fisheries Office, and cultivated it to the head of the flab for the production of the flab.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with G, without obtaining permission from the President of the National Institute of Fisheries, which is the competent administrative agency of G, and transplanted a total of 130 km from that time to March 9, 2012, in collusion with each purchaser at least nine times, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

B. The defendant's grounds for appeal are ex officio prior to judgment.