logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2017.07.20 2017고단18
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 18"

1. On November 5, 2016, the Defendant, at the office of women-friendly C located in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2016, access online items to the website, and sold “I” the call-based game account.

The phrase "" was posted, and the victim D who reported and contacted the above article will sell "150,000 won to the host game through the Kakao Stockholm message."

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant did not hold the above game account, and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intent and ability to sell the game account.

Nevertheless, the defendant acquired 150,000 won through a new bank account (E) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the damaged person.

"2017 Highest 27"

2. On October 8, 2016, the Defendant visited the online items unit site and sold “Tick Game Account”.

“The 230,000 won will be sold to the victim F who reported and contacted the above writing through the Kakao Stockholm message.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant did not hold the above game account, and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intent to sell the game account.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 230,000 won from the injured party to the Nonghyup Bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

"2017 Highest 102"

3. On January 12, 2017, the Defendant purchased the Victim H’s H by accessing the Nurier’s website to purchase the Victim H.

“To report this writing and send a cell phone message to the victim H, and send “50,000 won on the face of the State”.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the Defendant did not hold the Edridton bank, and even if he received money from the injured party, it is obvious that the Defendant is a clerical error in writing, although it stated “the above account” in the bill of indictment for Edridton.

arrow