The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the confession and reflect of the defendant; (b) the defendant made an aggressive tendency due to the notion of coercion or qualification by the disabled of class 6 with visual disability; (c) the defendant had already been detained in other cases for a considerable period of time; and (d) the defendant has already failed to pay a fine of KRW 2.5 million due to other cases; (b) there is a need to be additionally detained in the workhouse; and (c) the defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daejeon District Court on September 7, 201 to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. ( native) on March 15, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 15, 2012. In light of the fact that the crime of this case and the violation of the Act on the Narcotics, etc. (f) on which the said judgment became final and conclusive falls under the grounds for reduction or exemption of punishment in relation to concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the defendant, the crime of this case committed jointly with C without any particular reason by assaulting the victim F (hereinafter "victim") and causing damage to the victim's character and character of oral and oral discipline, etc., which requires the victim's treatment of approximately two weeks, and the case is not less complicated; the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim up to this court; the defendant has been punished several times due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, the crime of injury, and the crime of assault, etc. committed in the past (five times of imprisonment, one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment, one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment, and four times of fines), and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments, such as the character, conduct and environment of the defendant, the background and result of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., so the defendant's assertion above is unreasonable.