Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

1. No person charged with an offense shall borrow or lend any access medium while requiring or promising to receive compensation in using or managing the access medium;

Nevertheless, on November 28, 2017, the Defendant received Kakao Stockholm messages stating that “The Kakao Stockholm messages will be paid KRW 3 million on a face to the E company employee, who should use the account for tax evasion, who will lend one Kaka card.” On January 9, 2018, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 6 million on a face to lend 2 Kakao Kakao Stockholm via a nameless person and a telephone call and a Kakao Kakao Stockholm.” On January 9, 2018.

On January 9, 2018, the Defendant continued to put two physical card cards linked to the new bank account (F, G) with the name of the Defendant in the 115-dong mail of Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, and delivered the nameless Kwikseter's article to him.

As a result, the defendant committed an act of lending the access media with promising to pay for the use and management of the access media.

2. In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the Defendant, from May 3, 2018, to the Incheon District Court (2018 High Court Order 1933) on May 3, 2018, “On January 3, 2018, the Defendant would offer a card of KRW 3 million per each for five days if he/she lends the physical card from a person who was in the name of the first police officer for five days.”

“After receiving the proposal and consenting thereto, “The”, on the same day, transferred each physical card connected to the Defendant’s new bank account (I and J) in the name of the Defendant in front of the 115 Dong-dong apartment 115 Dong-dong, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, to the above person in a manner that is deemed as having been subject to the duty of taxing,

The judgment of a fine of KRW 3,00,000 was rendered for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act with the content of “” and on July 3, 2018, it can be recognized that the said judgment became final and conclusive upon withdrawal of appeal. According to the above facts of recognition, the facts charged in this case are as follows.