The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On December 7, 2013, the Defendant, at around 05:40 on December 7, 2013, 2013, under the influence of alcohol in front of the C convenience points located in Namyang-si, and inflicted damage on the C convenience points. The Defendant: (a) the victim D entered the cell phone of the Defendant who was dried from the above influort, into the store where the victim attempted to dry the cell phone of the Defendant; (b) considered the victim as the act of the above influor; and (c) took off the brush, she saw the victim’s inside part of the body of the victim at two times, and assaulted the victim by walking the back part of the

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is obvious that the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant by submitting a written agreement stating the victim's wish not to be punished after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.