Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C (the remaining Defendants except Defendant A are the representatives of Defendant E Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of selling petroleum in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Defendant

A is a 11 ton owner of a truck G 11 ton of the G, Defendant H is a 14 ton owner of a truck of which the F (State) belongs, Defendant K is a 14 ton owner of a truck of which the 14 ton of the J, Defendant K is a string owner of a truck of which the 9.5 ton of the 9.5 ton of the truck of which the L (State) belongs, Defendant N is an owner of a truck of which the 25 ton of the truck, and Defendant P is a string owner of a truck of Q.

Defendant

C Using the fact that a trucking business operator subsidized oil smoke subsidies to a trucking business operator while operating a stock company at the same place as above, C conspired to receive oil subsidies by receiving 5% of the amount of money paid by fraudulent means after paying the oil payment with a cargo welfare card as if the trucking business operator had actually limited to the amount of money paid by fraudulent means after paying the oil payment with a cargo welfare card as if the trucking business operator had actually limited to the amount of money, and then return the remaining money to the trucking business operator.

1. On January 8, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with C, received 50,000,000 won from the Defendant’s cargo vehicle using the fuel subsidy exclusive card, and received 190,000 won from C to receive 101,091 won of fuel subsidy from the competent authority, the victim, in cash, from which he/she received 190,000 won from the competent authority, and received 100,091 won of fuel subsidy from December 17, 2014 from that time, he/she received 62 times in total, such as the list of crimes in attached Table 1 (A’s list of crimes) from December 17, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused A and C by the prosecution;

1. Each police officer against S.