beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly prepared from 2000 to 2006 among the documents listed in attached Table 1 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The plaintiff is a church established in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D D around October 1959.
Defendant B served as a member of the Plaintiff church from around 1964 to 2001, and Defendant C is an infant of Defendant B.
B. On July 26, 1965, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale on July 20, 1965 with respect to D major 638 square meters (the land category was changed on November 13, 1995 to a religious site; hereinafter “pre-mergered real estate”).
On April 29, 1982, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer for reasons of the exchange on March 31, 1982 with respect to the land category of 139 square meters in Dongjak-gu Seoul E (the land category was changed to a religious site on July 9, 1979; hereinafter “E real estate”).
On November 13, 1995, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer on the real estate before the merger with the Plaintiff on September 14, 1995.
Meanwhile, as the “real estate before the merger” and “E real estate” were combined on July 9, 1997, the Seoul D Religious Site was 777 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”). On February 18, 2004, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant real estate to F, a foundation, on February 11, 2004.
C. Defendant B filed an application with the Seoul Central District Court 2016Kahap81436 against F, a foundation on November 10, 2016 for provisional disposition of prohibiting the disposal of real estate under the premise that “the genuine owner of the real estate before the merger is Defendant B and the exercise of the right to demand cancellation of the ownership transfer registration under the title trust agreement with the Plaintiff was made.” The Plaintiff’s application for provisional disposition of prohibiting the disposal of real estate under the premise that “the exercise of the right to demand cancellation of the ownership transfer registration was made only to the Plaintiff,” dated September 30, 2001; November 27, 2005; December 31, 2006; April 29, 2007; June 24, 2007; June 24, 2007; December 30, 2007; and the third party on March 27, 2003;