The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In full view of all the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the following: (a) the confession of the Defendant; (b) multiple criminal records and criminal records of the Defendant; and (c) the frequency of medication up to twice; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment; (b) motive and means and consequence of the commission of the commission of the commission; and (c) the circumstances following the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, even if considering the circumstance that the Defendant cooperates in the arrest of the criminal of Bosing (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.