logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.11.18 2013고단477
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 13:30 on June 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven the Cone Star bus without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the Gyeongju University Hospital located in Jinju-dong, Jinju-si, Jinnam-si to the light-based street street street in the 20km section of the 30km road in the city of Jinju-si; and (b) the Defendant driven the Cone Star bus without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving Cone Stars.

On June 1, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle without a driver's license on June 13:30, and operated the three-lane of the luminous map street in front of the old and mountain mountain three-lanes in the direction of passage from the high side to the direction of passage at the time of the city, while driving the three-lane of the luminous map in the direction of passage at the high side, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle at a speed of about 30km in the speed of speed in order to return back to the high-speed direction.

There are three-distance crossings where signal lights are installed, and there was a vehicle directly engaged in accordance with the signals in the opposite direction at the time, so in such a case, a driver engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents while normally proceeding in accordance with the instructions of the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front portion of the E business car driven by the victim D (Nam, 54 years old) who was on the opposite direction due to the negligence of the Defendant and violated the signal, from the front side of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the horse that requires the above victim D treatment for about two weeks, the injury to the victim F (V, 54 years old) who was accompanied by the above mae-car, such as catum salt, tensions, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the same victim G (V, 53 years old), respectively, for about two weeks of treatment.

3. No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

arrow