(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.06.12 2013고단920

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.06.12 2013고단920

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:00 on January 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) galloned the victim D’s house in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 204; (b) galloned as D, and galloned as D, and galloned the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 1 million in the market value on his/her book; (c) 1,000 won in cash and 10,000 won in cash and 3 credit cards owned by the victim; and (d) stolen them.

2. Fraud or violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. At around 02:32 on January 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) in G teahouse operated by the Victim F in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) even if having received alcoholic beverages from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price properly; and (c) although there was no legitimate authority to use the card in D, the Defendant stolen as stated in paragraph (1) and thus, did not have a legitimate authority to use it, the Defendant ordered the victim to order the two-way disease and received the two-way disease from the victim as if he would pay the price normally; and (d) requested the victim to pay the price by receiving the two-way disease from the victim; and (e) issued a new card in the name of the victim, such as paragraph (1), to have the victim prepare the sales slip; and (e) signed

The Defendant used the stolen credit card and was provided with the two-way injury worth 2.50,000 won at the market price by the victim.

B. At around 03:01 on January 26, 201, the Defendant: (a) in G teahouse operated by the Victim F in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) not only did the intent or ability to pay the price properly even if the Defendant received alcoholic beverages from the victim, but also did not have due authority to use the card in the name of D because the Defendant stolen as stated in paragraph (1); and (c) did not have due authority to use it, the Defendant ordered two diseases in the name of the victim, and the owner of the two diseases in the name of the Defendant, and the owner of the two diseases in the name of the Defendant, and the owner was provided by the

참조조문

-여신전문금융업법

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2013.05.23 2013고단433

-인천지방법원 2013.07.11 2013고단613

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.05.01 2015고단142

-부산지방법원 2014.03.14 2013고단8671

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.11.16 2012고단1357