logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.03.16 2016나60988
건물명도
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and Defendant C are dismissed.

2. The portion resulting from the principal lawsuit out of the costs of appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: Eul evidence No. 10 which is insufficient to recognize the facts of defendant B's assertion as additional evidence submitted in the trial of the court of first instance; and since it is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except where "D, the mother of the plaintiff, died on March 17, 1998, and thereafter died on January 29, 199," "from January 29, 1999, the mother of the plaintiff," the second part of the judgment No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "from January 29, 199."

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and the plaintiff's counterclaim against the defendant Eul is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals against the defendants' appeal and the counterclaim against the defendant Eul are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow