1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 11, 2014, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of “the head of the Suwon Disabled Welfare Center’s 6th platform, an electronic sign board falling on a bridge and falling on the floor while falling off (hereinafter “instant accident”), and applied for disability benefits to the Defendant after obtaining medical treatment approval from the Defendant by November 25, 2015.”

B. On December 10, 2015, the Defendant decided the Plaintiff’s final disability grade as 11 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) in accordance with the results of the Seoul Regional Headquarters’s integrated examination that “The Plaintiff is deemed to have no hindrance to the function of the pipe and both sides of the center (class 12) on December 10, 2015, although there is no hindrance to the Plaintiff’s labor due to the Madro-Malie Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro-Madro

C. The Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Defendant, but received a decision to dismiss the request for review from the Defendant on April 2016, and thereafter filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but received a decision to dismiss the request for reexamination from the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Considering the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff has a playground.