1.The judgment of the first instance, including the claims extended in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall set forth in attached Form 1.1.

1. Basic facts

A. The current status of the Plaintiffs’ fisheries 1 Plaintiffs reside in the Dapo-ri and Dapo-ri in the vicinity of the Seoul Metropolitan area reclaimed land operated by the Defendant, and the Dopo-ri and the Dopo-ri and Incheon strengthened Gun's Dopo-ri and the Dopo-ri and the Dopo-ri and Dopo-ri

4. to 4

7. The Plaintiffs have been engaged in coastal fisheries, demarcated fisheries, and inshore fisheries with the stated fishery permit (including the successors of those who died while engaging in coastal fisheries as seen below, as seen in the following clause. 2) The Plaintiffs’ permitted coastal fisheries, among the permitted fisheries, is a coastal network (including coastal oil network, coastal cateral network), coastal fishing network, coastal cateral network, coastal complex (including coastal cateral fishing, coastal cateral cateral net), and is a fishery with the permitted fishing vessel and gear within the permitted fishing zone, and is a fishery personnel who captures aquatic animals by using the permitted fishing vessel and gear. The operation zone is set up as Gyeonggi-do, or Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, except for coastal cateral net fishing (the operation zone of coastal cateral fishing is a sea area in which the fishing zone of coastal cateral cateral cateral cateral cateral fishing is for the sake of convenience.

(3) Unlike licensed fisheries, the Plaintiffs’ fisheries is not a fishery with a “fishing ground” under the Fisheries Act that can exclusively control a certain area of waters, but the main place of operation of the Plaintiffs is not fixed depending on their respective Plaintiffs and the types of fisheries, but it is common to strengthen the level of strengthening and strengthening the number of sloping lines and strengthening the number of sloping lines.