1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff lent a total of KRW 65 million to the defendant as the cause of the claim in this case, and sought payment of the above KRW 65 million to the defendant as well as damages for delay.

On the other hand, the parties have the burden of proving whether the transaction was based on the monetary loan contract. According to the evidence No. 2-1 and No. 2-2 of the evidence No. 2, the plaintiff remitted to the defendant the amount of KRW 10 million on September 26, 201, KRW 40 million on October 11, 201, and KRW 15 million on February 25, 2013, although it is recognized that the plaintiff remitted each of the above evidence No. 1-1, No. 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4-1, 5 through 8, 9-1 through 7, and 9-7, each of the above evidence No. 1, 1, 3, 4-2, 3, and 4-1, 2, 3, and 4-1, 200 won to the defendant, in light of the purport of each of the statements and arguments No. 9-1 through 5, 2011.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.