1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

On May 15, 2017, the above court with respect to the distribution procedure of this Court C.

1. (1) The basis of the claim was awarded a contract for D & D construction to the Sung-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “sexual State”), which was agreed to pay the subcontract price directly by the above sex state and the above sex state, the E, F, and G, the lower recipient, as follows:

[The above direct payment agreement shall, regardless of whether the contract or subcontract has been actually executed or completed, transfer the obligation of the principal contractor to the subcontractor (E, etc.) for the construction cost directly to the ordering person, and the principal contractor shall not request the construction cost. It shall be interpreted that the said E, etc. shall not directly pay the construction cost to the ordering person within the scope of the actual execution or completion of the construction work under each subcontract. However, it shall not affect the conclusion of the instant case even for the former purpose). The amount agreed to be directly paid on September 1, 2015, e.g., F., F. 8,140,000 G 140, 900 G 11, 90, 2000 to September 24, 2015, 205 to the court of law, 205, 301, 15, 305, 15, 205, 205, 205, 205, 2015, 315, 25, 25, 201,

(3) On the other hand, Nonparty H’s Suwon District Court Decision 2015Kadan922 delivered on January 13, 2016, which indicated that the sewage supply work of the beneficiaries of the above E, etc. is not yet completed at the time of service (the sewage supply work of the beneficiaries of the above E, etc.). On the other hand, Nonparty H’s claim for the construction payment is indicated as a bond against which the obligor is liable, and Nonparty H’s claim for the construction payment is attached.