logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.28 2017고단1577
절도등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny;

A. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant, at around 23:10, committed a theft by taking advantage of the gaps in the victim’s surveillance negligence in the victim C(44) room operated by the victim C(D). On February 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a game in the victim’s “D” room; (b) caused a theft of 28,000 won at the market price.

6. Around 20:20, in the same manner at the same place, 28,000 won of the market was stolen.

Defendant’s Month

8. Around 10:15, at the same place, the Defendant brought 28,000 won or more at the same price in the same manner. 2. Around 14:40 on February 10, 2017, the Defendant damaged the utility of property at the market price of KRW 28,000 in total, by putting 3 hedges equivalent to KRW 28,00 in the market price owned by the victim C on the ground that the game was put into a game in the above PC room on the ground that the fire was caused.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to attaching photographs identical to damaged articles);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 329 and 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As for the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Provisional Payment Order, theft of and damage to the PC parts several times in the PC room, the fact that there was a record of punishment for larceny, the fact that the PC was punished for the larceny crime, the fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed during the period of the repeated crime, and the fact that the thief was committed in violation of the Military Service Act and the fact that

The defendant's intelligence level is somewhat low, there is a power to receive treatment due to shock disorder, etc., all the confessions of the crime, the restoration of the damage, and the victim's smooth agreement with the victim.

arrow