A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

In fact, the Defendant invested in the promotion of the apartment reconstruction implementation project located in the Jung-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City in around 2007, and did not have any other property, and tried to operate the project through the selection of the contractor as the contractor and the lending of the PF funds. However, it is difficult to rely on the PF funds borrowed by the lender due to the fact that the props capable of selecting the contractor and lending the PF funds did not obtain the consent, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed funds even if it was delivered with the money under the pretext of granting the right of removal, design, or borrowing from the victim C, even if it was promised to do so.

Nevertheless, on July 11, 2007, the Defendant received KRW 99,000,000 from around 17 times to October 25, 2007, as indicated in the separate crime list, including the transfer of KRW 30,000 from the victim three times in the same day. In short, the Defendant acquired KRW 17 times in total from around 2007 to around 25, 200.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement among the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a trading statement and a trading list of savings deposits;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (generally with regard to the pertinent criminal facts and Article 347(1) of the choice of punishment) is that the defendant led to the crime of this case, and that there is no record of being sentenced to the punishment of the same crime or the suspended sentence or heavier

However, even though the amount of damage has been considerable and considerable period of time has elapsed from the date of damage, the defendant argued that he paid 20 million won in addition to the damages.