The appeal is dismissed.

Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance is applicable.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that all the charges of this case were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on experience or the rules of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (measures

Therefore, the appeal shall be dismissed. Of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act" is obvious that the "Article 148-2 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 10790, Jun. 8, 201)" is an error of "Article 148-2 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act". Thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.