logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.13 2015가단128475
전세권설정등기말소
Text

1. The defendant shall not apply to the plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C, as stated in the attached list.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On April 29, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) to lease the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”). On June 10, 2010, the Deceased completed the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon as the receipt of No. 77081 on June 10, 2010.

(hereinafter referred to as “registration of creation of chonsegwon”). B.

Upon the expiration of the above lease agreement on September 17, 2012, the Plaintiff returned KRW 100 million to the Deceased, and received the instant real estate, but the Deceased did not cancel the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon.

C. On September 15, 2013, the Deceased died, and among the inheritors of the Deceased, the Defendant applied for a qualified acceptance and the report was accepted (U.S. District Court Decision 2013 D, E, and F, who are the remaining inheritors, renounced their inheritance.

(Yiju District Court 2013 Modan538) d.

Therefore, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased, the Defendant, the sole inheritor of the deceased, is obligated to perform the cancellation registration procedure on September 17, 2012, with respect to the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon completed on June 10, 2010 as the receipt No. 77081, which was completed on June 10, 2010.

2. Judgment on deemed confession (Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow