logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.04 2017고단5330
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the Gwangju Northern Police Station located in Seo-gu, Gwangju; and (b) on February 4, 2017, the Defendant: (c) made a false statement to the effect that he/she had a sexual intercourse under mutual agreement between the Defendant’s home, the Defendant, who was aware of the fact; (d) on February 4, 2017, at the Defendant’s home, he/she had a sexual intercourse; (c) but (d) on February 4, 2017, he/she made a false statement to the effect that “A person drinking alcohol, such as the Defendant’s wife, was prevented from being seated by the Defendant, and was forced to have sexual assault,” and (d) made a statement of damage

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint for the purpose of having the defendant's tenant receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect with regard to C;

1. Statement of complaint and statement (No. 2 list of evidence);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the analysis of suspect's identity cards with the details of settlement of suspect-use cards);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 157, 153, and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confession [the scope of recommendation] [the reasons for sentencing under Article 157, 153, and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] type 1 (1-1 year)] mitigation area (1-1 year) / [the person subject to special mitigation] / [the sentence was sentenced] 8 months (the defendant was subject to punishment heavier than that of sexual assault; the defendant was sexual intercourse; the defendant was sexual intercourse with the defendant, and was sexual intercourse with the defendant. However, in light of the circumstances before and after the crime, it appears that there was a purpose to recover the claims owed by the defendant, etc. against the person living together with the defendant, etc., at the time of the crime; the defendant merely filed a complaint and made a statement on the day when he made a statement, and submitted the report to the investigative agency after the examination and examination of stress response.

arrow