logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.09.25 2019고단3758
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “The Defendant would pay an amount of KRW 15 million for each week through the successful bid system consisting of 16 members, so he/she would pay an amount of KRW 15 million if he/she has subscribed to the successful bid system.”

However, from around September 2010, the Defendant operated a small amount of KRW 3 million and KRW 5 million in operating a fraternity from early 201 to early 201. However, when operating a fraternity in the above B, the situation where the operation of a fraternity was difficult due to the failure of some of the members of the fraternity to pay the fraternity, and the fact that the payment of the fraternity was not made by the victim, etc., and the fact that there was no amount to pay the fraternity in excess of the amount to pay the fraternity, thereby operating a separate fraternity by borrowing the fraternity from the victim, etc., or having the fraternity not paid the fraternity to pay the fraternity to the victim at once. In this case, the “dumping limit” is deemed to be a case where a person operating a fraternity by recruiting the fraternity to pay the fraternity at once, but fails to pay the fraternity in excess of the amount to pay the fraternity.

In the case of such a “dumping”, the beginning date and the opening date are below. In addition, such dumping limits are the same as the limit amount (including interest) received by a newly admitted member, and there is a short time to receive the limit amount than the existing source.

Even though the system is operated in such a way as to join the company, there was no intention or ability to pay an ordinary fraternity even if the victim receives a deposit from the victim.

The Defendant from March 19, 201 to June 18, 2012, from the victim.

arrow