logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.23 2014나42522
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the entry of this case by the court of first instance concerning the defendant's assertion are as follows: the defendant's assertion in this case is rejected as evidence of rejection of each entry in Eul evidence No. 14 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply) which was submitted additionally in the trial; Eul 10 to 13; each entry in Eul 12, 14, and 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance is not sufficient evidence; and "C" is the same as the entry in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where "D" is deemed as "D."

(G) The court below held that even if the defendant resided in the above real estate at the time when D, a lessee of the instant real estate, had a duty to deliver the instant real estate to the plaintiff as long as 24 months have elapsed since October 31, 2010, which was the expiration date of the grace period, without taking the procedure for change of the contractor's name or succession to the status under the instant lease contract, and without taking any procedure for the change of the contractor's name or succession to the status under the instant lease contract.

arrow