1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant C, KRW 22,323,214.

1. As to the claim against Defendant A, B, C, Hyundai Mart and E

A. The following facts are: (a) evidence No. 1-4; (b) evidence No. 2-1-2; (c) evidence No. 3-1-1 through No. 12; and (d) evidence No. 4-1 through No. 3 (Evidence No. 2-3 (Support Certificate) cannot be deemed as evidence because there is no evidence to acknowledge the authenticity of the part in the Defendant’s preparation; (d) the evidence No. 4-1 through No. 3 (POS and peripheral device supply contract, equipment list) may not be deemed as evidence between the Plaintiff, Defendant A, C, and Hyundai Mart; and (e) the evidence No. 150-1 through No. 3 (POS and peripheral device supply contract, equipment list) is presumed to have been discovered by the Defendant’s name and seal; and (e) there is no other dispute between the Plaintiff and Defendant E, but there is no evidence to prove that the above document was forged by the Defendant’s entire purport of pleading; and (e) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant E, the confession pursuant to the main text of Article 150(3).

1) Defendant A, B, C, and Hyundai Marart Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “satise marijuana”).

(E) In operating a store, E is an agent to conduct a credit card inquiry, approval, etc. and charge a certain fee between the credit card company, VN service credit card company and the franchise store, and the Plaintiff and credit card VN service franchise store contract (hereinafter “instant contract”).

A) Each contract was concluded, and each service was provided, such as receiving support for the SPOS equipment, etc. The contract period and the contract period, the number of monthly contracts, the amount equivalent to the market price of the supported equipment, and the date of termination of the contract and the remaining period are as follows. Serial B B B B B B B B B on November 23, 2016 on July 24, 2016 and July 23, 2016: