logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.09.19 2018고단1890
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaging in driving a PP car.

On April 22, 2018, at around 20:15, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.125% 0.125%, while driving the said car, and driving the road prior to the “D Burial” located in Sejong City C from Daejeon to the tent, and led to the internship.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident by safely driving the motor vehicle while keeping the motor vehicle line.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to commit so, and went on the lane of the victim E (the age of 64) driving, which was driven in the opposite part of the case where the Defendant was negligent in driving the center line, and was faced with the front part of the victim E(the age of 64) driving with the front part of the vehicle of the Defendant driving, thereby causing approximately 14 weeks of treatment to the victim, such as the body frame of the uppermost body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Traffic accident report, report on the circumstances of an employee-employed driver, investigation report, and report on the case of an employee-employed driver, and inquiry request or inquiry;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that, at the time of crossing signal of the front crossing, the Defendant and his defense counsel continued a U-turn at low speed at a place less than the distance on the crosswalk, and that the victim’s right side from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which is not the opposite one, carried at a rapid speed along the crosswalk and the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle on which the U-turn was in the U-turn, was received, and that there was no breach of duty of care.

However, even if the defendant's partial statement is followed, the accident of this case is driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol at a place where U.S. is prohibited by the defendant, and the central line is invaded.

is an accident that occurred;

arrow