Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months and fines for 5,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by fines for 3,000,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "I" and the defendant B is a person who has worked for the office at the above business establishment.

The Defendants, together with the Defendants from November 10, 2016 to December 12, 2016, advertised the above businesses on the Internet sites, such as Jtel 914, 1410, and 1827, Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jtel 914, 1410, and 1827, and reported the advertisement to the said officetels, and had been waiting for the said officetels by guiding male customers who reported the advertisement to the said officetels.

Ma, N, andO received 160,000 to 350,000 won from male customers, and had male guests do sexual intercourse with other male customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of a police suspect against M, N, orO;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who choose a sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor and fines concurrently (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic) Defendant B: Selection of a fine;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract the workhouse (the Defendants)

1. (Defendant A) The amount of sexual traffic referred to in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, was confiscated from the sexual traffic women at the site, and thus, the amount of money for sexual traffic referred to in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of the said Act cannot be deemed as a co-offender in the crime of arranging commercial sex acts, and since the commercial sex women have yet to settle accounts with the owner of the trade

Inasmuch as it cannot be seen as being separately sentenced to confiscation, it shall not be sentenced to confiscation.

1. The following specific circumstances are specified in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of participation in the instant crime, the duration of the instant crime, and the crime.