logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.01.08 2013가단13114
무허가건물철거등
Text

1. The Defendant points out each of the attached Form 2 marks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 among the forest land B 291,256 square meters in Incheon pool-gun.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 2, 1993, the deceased C was the owner who completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to forest No. 291,256 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”). On January 19, 2004, he consented on the Defendant to use the instant land No. 1,320 square meters as the Defendant’s site for the installation of solar power plants.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant loan of use”). (b)

The Defendant, within the scope of 1,320 square meters among the instant land, newly constructed the instant luminous board for solar power plants and each of the instant appurtenant buildings, uses it as a solar power plant.

C. On June 9, 201, the Deceased died, and on June 9, 201, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer through inheritance consultation and division.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and the court's entrustment of appraisal to the Vice Governor of the Korea Cadastral Cadastral Corporation of Incheon, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

가. 당사자들의 주장 원고는, 망인은 피고로부터 태양광발전시설인 집광판 몇 개만 꼽으면 된다는 얘기를 듣고 무상으로 이 사건 토지의 사용을 승낙한 것인데 피고는 원고의 승낙이 없이 불법으로 이 사건 각 부속건물을 축조하고 텃밭, 적재장을 포함하여 이 사건 토지 중 약 1643㎡을 사용하고 있고, 이로써 별지 도면1 표시 ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㅊ, ㅋ, ㅌ, ㄱ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 (다)부분은 맹지가 되어 소유권행사에 제한을 받고 있으므로, 원고는 피고에 대하여 이 사건 사용대차계약의 해지, 착오 또는 기망에 의한 사용대차계약의 취소한다고 주장한다.

The defendant asserts that the land of this case is used and utilized within the scope of 1,320 square meters, and that each of the instant appurtenant buildings is necessarily necessary as an appurtenant building operating and managing solar power plants, and that the period of use and benefit has not been lost, so the plaintiff's claim cannot be complied with.

arrow