Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Nos. 7 through 11 of seized evidence from Defendant A and seized evidence 1.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On March 31, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Leakage of Personal Information, etc.) at the Seoul Central District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. (hereinafter “Act”) and was released on October 28, 2016 during the execution of the sentence and passed on December 18,

[Criminal facts] No person may intermediate another person's communications through telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide it for another person's communications.

On January 31, 2017, Defendant A opened an Internet site (F) on the first floor of Suwon-si E, and consulted the buyers who have reported and contacted with the contents, such as “Korean nationals, foreigners’ pre-paid pop-up chips, occupational exposure NO, and pre-paid unlimited,” and Defendant B was supplied from H offices located in Suwon-si G to obtain wired chips opened in the name of foreigners, etc. from foreigners, etc. at the H office located in Suwon-si, and solicited buyers to sell so-called “large chips” by sharing the role of delivering deep chips (the sales proceeds are KRW 170,000 won under the name of foreigners, and KRW 200,000 won under the name of Korean nationals).

On February 22, 2017, the Defendants conspired to sell five core chips opened in the name of a foreigner, etc. to a purchaser (J) who reported and contacted the above Internet site at the above H office at KRW 1,460,00 and delivered them to the Changwon bus terminal from around that time to June 7, 2017, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 173 to 35,735,000, total of the core chips opened in the name of a foreigner, etc. to 141.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of communications by others.

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each internal investigation report (the No. 1 to 6 of the evidence list), respectively.