beta
Text
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 500,000 with 5% per annum from September 4, 2018 to November 12, 2020 and from the following day.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 10, 2017, the Plaintiff, a veterinarian, entered into an entrustment contract with Cheongju-si and the F Center, and served as the head of the F Center located in Cheongju-gu G from around that time to October 2018 (hereinafter “instant center”).
B. The defendant from August 24, 2018 to the same year
9. Not later than three times until March, the Defendant’s personal data (ID: H) posted each notice on the Plaintiff (hereinafter “O”) in sequence, and each of the above notices posted by the Defendant (hereinafter “each of the instant notices”).
The specific details are as shown in attached Table 1 to 4.
C. At around 17:20 on August 2, 2018, the Plaintiff received a summary order of KRW 3,000,000 on September 26, 2019, under the charge of violating the Animal Protection Act, and issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,00,00 on September 26, 2019, as the charges of violating the Animal Protection Act, that: (a) the Plaintiff was handed over the mixing with a heat shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot sleb
(Cheongju District Court 2019 High Court 201Da6203). The plaintiff filed a formal trial against the above summary order by asserting innocence, but on July 23, 2020, the court rendered a judgment of conviction of a fine of KRW 3,000,000 to the plaintiff (Cheongju District Court 2019 High Court 728), and the plaintiff appealed the above judgment and continues the appellate trial.
(Cheongju District Court 2020No903) d.
A summary order of KRW 3,00,000 is issued on May 14, 2019, as the facts charged that “I, who had been in charge of the management of the pertinent center from March 2017 to December 2017, who had been working as the head of the instant center, made a statement of facts through information and communications networks for the purpose of slandering the Plaintiff, or by means of defamation indicating false facts in violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation).”