All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times, including two times of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime related to violence, the Defendant committed a crime of injury, assault, intimidation, and property damage against many victims, and committed a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties against the police officers arresting him.

Defendant is highly likely to repeatedly commit a crime even after he/she was investigated by an investigative agency due to some of the crimes.

The defendant was unable to receive a letter from most victims.

However, the defendant is against himself while committing a crime.

It does not seem that the actual damage caused by the defendant's crime is very serious.

Defendant also sustained an injury by assaulting some victims.

Some victims do not want to punish the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, all of the sentencing conditions and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines as shown in the arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and the prosecutor's argument are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Provided, That in the application of the law of the court below, the "the crime of injury by the victim on June 28, 2020" of the "the crime of injury by the victim on June 28, 2020" is a clerical error in the "the crime of injury to the victim B", and it is obvious that it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25