1. The Defendants indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 among the rooftop floors of the building listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list to the Plaintiff.

1. According to the facts that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including Serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff is the owner of the building listed in the separate sheet No. 1; ② on October 16, 2009, defendant A entered into a lease agreement with the plaintiff on 417.48 square meters out of the 593 square meters of the rooftop floor among the buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter "the leased object of this case") with the plaintiff on 36,000, annual rent of 10,000, annual rent of 10,000 (including value-added tax), and the lease agreement with the plaintiff on 16.16. to 15.15.11.20, the lease agreement with the plaintiff on 200,000 won for the rent of this case, and the lease agreement with the plaintiff on 16.15.2,011.

According to the above facts, the defendants currently occupy the leased object of this case without permission.

As such, the Plaintiff removed screen golf practice range facilities installed on the leased object of this case.