1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 129,80,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 20% per annum from May 2, 2015 to September 30, 2015; and (b) the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur who prepares for events, such as the general assembly of associations, and operates agency business, under the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant is an association established for the purpose of urban environment rearrangement project in which the Gu and America are located D.

B. In order to hold the Defendant’s general meeting, the Plaintiff actually performed the preparation and holding of the general meeting on February 12, 2014 to February 27, 2014, and the Defendant held the general meeting on February 27, 2014 (hereinafter “instant general meeting”); the general meeting was designated as a new company construction company (hereinafter “new company construction”); and the Hyundai Asian Construction consortium Co., Ltd. as a contractor.

A A service contract (Evidence 3)

1. A project owner: The defendant;

2. Beneficiaries: C.

3. A service contract: Affairs related to the progress of an annual meeting of urban environment rearrangement projects B.

4. Amount of services: 118,000,000 won (excluding value-added tax).

5. Period of service: Article 3 of the General Conditions of Service (Scope of Services) on February 12, 2014 through February 27, 2014 (16 days).

1. Operation and management of public relations personnel related to the proceedings of the ordinary general meeting;

2. Other services requested by A (Defendant) to B for the success of the project.

2. The time to pay service costs shall be paid within one week after the opening of the general meeting of shareholders.

Notwithstanding Article 4 (2), the deadline for payment of service charges shall be paid by the contractor selected as a result of the general meeting on the date the deposit is paid to A.

C. On February 27, 2014, the date of the instant general meeting, the Plaintiff drafted a business service agreement with the Defendant with the following content.

(hereinafter “instant service contract”). D.

On May 20, 2014, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay the service cost related to holding an ordinary general meeting immediately after the contractor pays the bond. On May 23, 2014, the Defendant respondeded that the contractor did not pay the service cost and operating cost to the Plaintiff on May 23, 2014, and that the contractor would immediately pay the service cost to the Plaintiff.

(e).