1. Defendant B and C jointly share KRW 136,458,500 to the Plaintiff, and Defendant C from June 27, 2008 to August 19, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B’s status as the parties is each representative director of G Company (G Company; hereinafter “G”) and H Co., Ltd., a Korean corporation (hereinafter “H”). Defendant C, who was appointed as a director of H, resigned on March 30, 2010. Defendant D, who was appointed as the inside director of H, retired on December 10, 2010. Defendant C, who was appointed as the inside director of H, retired from office, and retired from office on December 10, 2010. Defendant E, who was employed as the head of the headquarters of H’s operating division, retired from office, and Defendant F was working as the regular director of H.

B. Defendant B, around October 2007, established H in Korea, and established G in the Philippines, and had Defendant D take charge of G in the name of G while having Defendant B purchase land (hereinafter “the instant land”) located in the Philippines in the name of G, while having Defendant B take charge of G in the Philippines.

Defendant B is running a large-scale housing complex development project (hereinafter “the instant project”) on the instant land to applicants for purchase of unspecified land visiting H’s regular business, general business, and business team employees, who wish to visit the company, and upon the receipt of some of the instant land in the instant land, the construction of the G site is completed, and the several parts of the instant land are transferred to the said land, and the G can only construct the said land, and if it does not want to manage the housing and obtain two million won of the monthly rent, it can be redeemed in 200,000 won per square day, and in the process, exchange gains can also be obtained. In the instant process, the contractor who paid down the down payment should provide education to explain the land, and in the case of the contractor who paid the down payment, the contractor who received the contract should make an on-site answer if desired, and the executive and employee who made the contract pay a considerable amount of money in accordance with the record of sale.

Accordingly, the executive officers and employees in charge of sale explained about the business of this case to the applicants for land purchase as they received education.

(c)

The plaintiff.