logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고합372
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person registered as a preliminary candidate in the election district C when he permits the election of the 20th National Assembly member.

1. No one shall conduct an election campaign prior to the election campaign period, and except where it is used for a speech, interview or debate at the place of a campaign speech or interview at an open place or at the place of an interview or debate under the Election of Public Officials Act, or for a campaign speech, interview or debate, he/she shall use a precise device for the election campaign;

On February 16, 2016, the Defendant attended the meeting for claiming compensation for damage from the noise and dust from the F new construction works, at around 40 residents, who attended the meeting of the representative council of occupants of the E apartment complex from India, around 11:30 to around 40, 2016.

At that place, the defendant is liable for this case by using a mephone, which is the positive growth.

The proposal was intended to be included in G complex while it was created by this H.

I shall audit and inspect.

The name A shall be forgotten, and a large number of Doz. Doz.

The proposal was extremely high at the end of the meeting when it is intended to do so.

For this reason, it has been so-called Dop Dop. at this time.

“A speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

Accordingly, the Defendant carried out an election campaign before the election campaign period (from March 31, 2016 to April 12, 2016) and carried out an election campaign using a positive device.

2. On February 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) attended a meeting held between the persons related to construction of F apartment buildings in the conference room for the representative of apartment occupants in Yongsan-si, Incheon-si; and (b) the residents of the said council; and (c) distributed one unit of house worth 5,000 won at the market price published by the Defendant to the chairperson of the said council for the representative of occupants; and (d) made a contribution by distributing one unit of house worth 5,00 won at the market price published by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to L, J and I;

1. Each investigation report (the confirmation of the suspect’s low “M” recipient;

arrow