1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,550,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 19, 2014 to April 8, 2015.

1. According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence No. 1 (the defendant alleged to the effect that Gap evidence No. 1 was modified, but compared with Gap evidence No. 1 and the contract documents submitted by the defendant, it is hard to see that all the items and delivery conditions of the contract corresponding to the cause of the claim and the terms and conditions for the payment thereof are modified, and there is no other evidence to support this, the above argument by the defendant is not accepted) and the whole pleadings of the above 20. The plaintiff is 0,00,000 won in total and 10,000 won in 0,000 won in 10,000 won in 20,000 won in 20,000 won in 10,000 won in 20,000 won in 10,000 won in 20,000 won in 10,000 won in 20,00 won in 20,00 won in 3.

In addition, the Plaintiff.