logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.03.29 2019고정113
국민체육진흥법위반(도박등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person, other than the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation or an entrusted business entity, shall gambling in return for offering property or property benefits to persons who correctly predicted the result of issuing sports betting tickets or similar things.

On March 16, 2016, the Defendant joined C, an Internet gambling site, with access to the Defendant’s residence located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, B and the first floor, and then transferred KRW 200,000 to the E-bank account (F) in the name of the said website operator, which is a deposit account designated by the said website operator, and received a deposit amount of KRW 20,000,000 from the said amount, and performed gambling by means of betting the game money on the foreign country offered on the said website and the domestic sports games, and then receiving a refund of dividends of the rate designated according to whether or not the money is valuable. From that time to February 21, 2017, the Defendant collected KRW 160,900,000 in total over 293 times, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, from that time, from that time to February 21, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Data to close a G course and data to close a course;

1. Application of statutes to each copy of each written financial transaction information;

1. Article 48 of the National Sports Promotion Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, and Articles 48 subparagraph 3 and 26 (1) of the National Sports Promotion Act and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his depth, and the defendant is an initial offender who has no criminal power, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered in light of the sentencing conditions indicated in the trial of this case.

arrow