The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

At around 13:30 on February 2, 2015, the Defendant, in relation to the exercise of the right to retention of the building B in the building B in the Namyang-si, B, 403, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims by saying, “The victim, E, and F, who had been suffering from the disease, shall be deemed as the right to substitute for the disease, but this son, son, son of bitch, son of bitom, son of bitomb, and son of bitch,” and speaking them as a large interest.

However, this case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed pursuant to Article 312(1) of the same Act. Since victims have cancelled the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.