The sentence of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A entrusted the management of H Co., Ltd with the owners who purchased the same hotel subparagraph E, f of the same hotel, C, and g of the same hotel at the time of leisure, and paid a rent.

1. On February 14, 2020, the Defendants: (a) conspired to write a scam in the door of each heading room owned by the Defendants to use the scam presses; and (b) purchased the scam presses to enter the hotel managed by the victim I in order to resist that the Defendants did not receive rent from the said D hotel; (c) around February 14, 2020.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly intruded on the structure managed by the victim.

2. Around 14:30 on February 21, 2020, the Defendants: (a) conspired to enter a D hotel, as described in paragraph (1); (b) conspired to enter the door of the head office owned by each party; and (c) according to the public offering, the Defendants entered the door of the head office owned by each party, thereby making a sculing “contractual termination.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to damage the victim I's own property owned by the victim I, which is the head of the D hotel facility team, and interfered with the rights of the victim and interfered with the management of the victim's hotel facility by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement to the effect that the Defendants, in this Court, acknowledged the fact that the Defendants committed objective acts, such as the entries in each of the facts charged of the instant case

1. A written statement to be prepared;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of On-Site photographs);

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint residence intrusion), Articles 323 and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business)

1. In the case of the ordinary concurrent Defendants: The Defendants who choose to impose a fine under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act: The choice of each fine.

1. Defendants among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act.