logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.11.16 2017고단265
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 265"

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or acquire any electronic financial access medium in using or managing the medium for access to electronic finance;

However, around January 2017, the Defendant provided C and D with a personal number necessary for the use of the said cash card and its password (hereinafter “the instant cash card and password”) from D, promising to pay a certain amount of price and distribute it to another person for the cash card (e) electronic financial access media in the name of the National Bank Account (E) in the name of the Defendant, which is located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, without notifying the trade name in Gangnam-gu.

On January 2017, the Defendant: (a) sought to obtain the cash card and password of this case from the Defendant’s residence located in the Seoul Gangdong-gu F and 502 via Internet search (the name was not known; (b) hereinafter “the transferee of this case”); (c) agreed to transfer the cash card and password of this case under the condition that one million won of the cash card and password would be paid through contact using mobile phone letters between the transferee and the transferee of this case; and (d) thereafter, the Defendant agreed to transfer the same year.

2. He sent the cash card of this case to the transferee of this case through Kwikset Service in Gangdong-gu Seoul Kwikset Station, and notified the transferee of this case of the password.

Accordingly, in collusion with the above C and D, the defendant transferred the cash card and password of this case to the transferee of this case on condition that one million won should be paid.

2. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, transfers the cash card and password of this case to the transferee of this case, as the Defendant transferred, according to the victim’s proposal, the above D’s bank account (hereinafter “instant account”) that the Defendant received separately from D.

arrow