1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the Housing Reconstruction Project Association approved on August 20, 202 by the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “head of Dongdaemun-gu”) for the purpose of implementing the reconstruction improvement project that newly constructs 11 and one commercial building (hereinafter referred to as the “instant commercial building”), and the Plaintiffs are the co-owners of the two previous sectional owners of the above previous commercial buildings, and the Plaintiff F and I are the successors of the deceased M. who were co-owners of the previous commercial buildings.

(b).

On August 19, 2004, after obtaining authorization for project implementation from the head of Dongdaemun-gu, the defendant passed a management and disposal plan (draft) at the extraordinary general meeting on November 20, 2004, and obtained authorization from the head of Dongdaemun-gu on January 7, 2005.

(hereinafter “Initial Management and Disposal Plan”). (c)

As to this, some of the Defendant’s union members filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking confirmation of invalidity of the first management and disposition plan as Seoul Administrative Court 2007Guhap36374, and the above court rendered a judgment on November 21, 2008 that confirmed invalidity of the first management and disposition plan. On this issue, the Defendant appealed (Seoul High Court 2009Nu43) and the appeal (Supreme Court 2010Du4407), but all of the appeals were dismissed, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around December 9, 2010.

When the initial management and disposition plan becomes null and void, the defendant holds an extraordinary general meeting on January 15, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the "first extraordinary meeting") and resolves a new management and disposition plan, and obtains authorization from the head of Dongdaemun-gu on April 6, 2012.

(hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”). E.

Since then on February 22, 2013, the defendant asserted that the date of the second special meeting is January 29, 2013, but the plaintiffs seem to be a clerical error.

A special general meeting shall be held to decide on the modification of a management and disposal plan (hereinafter referred to as "the second special meeting"), and on March 2013.