All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: The Defendants did not refuse to accept the documents, such as deposit passbooks and money withdrawal and payment, which are owned by the victim-friendly association as stated in the facts charged, and rather, did not accept the documents, etc. from the FF, even though the FF elected as the president after the meeting of the victim-friendly council was to accept the documents, etc. of this case.

2. The lower court found the Defendants guilty of the instant facts charged, based on the circumstances indicated in its reasoning, that the Defendants concealed the instant documents, etc. owned by the victim’s relatives association and made it difficult to use them.

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable (On the other hand, according to the evidence above, the defendants did not comply with the defendants' request for delivery of the documents of this case even at an extraordinary general meeting held on February 1, 2017, which was held on February 1, 2017, and held a board of directors at around F and on February 6 through 7, 2017, and proposed the second method of delivery with the former president and the former president, and the latter president and four general directors." However, the victim's family council cannot be deemed to have complied with the above proposal in the course of receiving the documents of this case from the defendants, and it cannot be deemed that the defendants did not accept the request of delivery of the documents of this case even before the extraordinary general meeting held on February 11, 2017, and the defendants did not have any error in the misapprehension of facts as alleged in the facts charged.