1. The part concerning the claim for confirmation of ownership among the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2. The remaining claims of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. Basic facts

A. On September 8, 1980, the Plaintiff (Appointed), the designated parties, and the network C were children of the network D, and the Defendant, as the wife of the network C, died of the network C on June 11, 2017.

B. Attached List of “Real Estate Indication”

1. On May 27, 1963, the registration of transfer of ownership under Article 2 of the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Transfer of Distributed Farmland was completed in the name of the deceased C on the ground of the completion of repayment on December 30, 1960.

C. Attached List of “Real Estate Indication”

2. On February 19, 1974, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on February 18, 1974 in the name of the deceased C on February 19, 1974.

Attached Form

List of Real Estate Labeling

3. On January 21, 1989, registration of preservation of ownership was completed in the name of the deceased C.

E. Since then, each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet shall be less than the real estates of this case.

On November 28, 2017, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of inheritance due to the agreement and division as of June 11, 2017 in the name of the defendant on November 28, 2017. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap 1 through Gap 2-3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Of the instant lawsuit, the lawsuit for confirmation of the legitimacy of the part concerning the claim for confirmation of ownership among the instant lawsuit requires the benefit of confirmation as a requirement for the protection of rights, and the benefit of confirmation is recognized when a judgment is rendered at the time of the most effective and appropriate means to eliminate the Plaintiff’s rights or legal status in danger and danger (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Da208255, Mar. 15, 2017). The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) asserted as follows and sought confirmation of ownership of each corresponding inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet of “Indication of Inheritance Shares” among each of the instant real estate, but seeking registration of ownership transfer against the Defendant constitutes the most effective means to eliminate the existing apprehension and danger of rights of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) among each of the instant real estate.