The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On May 2016, the Defendant violated the Illegal Number Table Control Act: (a) at the office of “D” operated by the Defendant in the Gu, during the mid-term and long-term period of Ansan-si; (b) in order to pay goods to E, the Defendant forged one copy of the check by putting the seal on “A”, “4,000,000,” and “B” on the issue date column; and (c) copying it using a copy of a printed machine in the said office.

B. Around May 2016, the Defendant paid the price for the goods to E located in Namyang-si, a forged check was delivered to E’s representative G as if it was duly formed, as set out in paragraph 1.

2. Examining the facts charged in the instant case, the forged check cannot be said to be a check issued by the Defendant in his name.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case against the defendant are not a crime, it is decided as per Disposition by the decision of not guilty pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.