A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on October 21, 2015, at the C office operated by the Defendant in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Mapo-gu) on the 201st day of October 21, 2015, proposed that the Defendant would have an air seat up to KRW 96 million for the purpose of making a pre-contract with the Party E by having the Defendant receive the air reservation from the Gu in Jin-gu to the Guam.

“.....”

However, the suspect did not have secured the tin of the air reservation from E to Guam, and even if he received the money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to make the tin of the air reservation in the Guam.

On October 21, 2015, the respondent was paid KRW 96 million in total to the Bank (G) in the name of the above Joint Representative F on October 21, 2015.

"2017 Highest 2445"

1. On August 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had an employee under the name and influence of the Defendant, Inc., Ltd., who was erroneous in the process of remitting the amount for the cancellation of aviation tickets; and (b) deposited KRW 1,489,600 in custody of the money transferred to the account (G) of the name of the Defendant’s Bank (C).

While the Defendant kept the above money for the victim, the Defendant embezzled the money from the “C” office of the travel business entity operating the Defendant with H and 1215 Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Office with business funds.

2. On September 8, 2016, the Defendant, at the above C office, sent a phone call to a staff member in charge of the name in the business division of the said victim’s South East Asia, and deposited the airline ticket fee at least three (3) days prior to the start of the Jeju-Sket, where the Defendant: (a) 3-5 day after the start of the aviation of the Asia-Sket; and (b) 3 days prior to the start of the week.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he was issued a ticket due to such circumstances as the monthly rent of the above office from July 2015 and the national health insurance premium of himself and his employees from around July 2015 due to the operational difficulties of the above C.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the same.