logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.05.31 2016고단121
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C High Class III cargo vehicles.

On January 14, 2016, around 16:42, the Defendant: (a) moved the distance prior to the “E pharmacy” located in Kim Jong-si D from the Kim Jong-si elementary school to the right-side of the viewing route.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle by checking whether a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle has a way to reduce the speed and see well the right and the right of the front side and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the victim F (the 77 years old) who was a victim F (the 77 years old) who was standing the above crosswalk from the right side to the left side by his negligence, and had the victim go beyond the floor.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as blood transfusion, from the injury of the victim due to the above occupational negligence, on the part of the victim, who did not have two openings in the two mains (head) in need of treatment for about 24 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. An investigation report (specific hours of accident), an investigation report (CCV analysis), an investigation report (Attachment to an on-site photo of an accident);

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant committed the instant traffic accident in violation of the duty of pedestrian protection in the crosswalk, and the victim was diagnosed to the effect that the degree of injury suffered by the victim is heavy (the degree of injury suffered by the victim was diagnosed to the effect that the treatment of 8 weeks is necessary in the initial surgery, and the rehabilitation treatment of 24 weeks is required.

arrow