beta
Text
1. Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. deposited on May 31, 2012 at the Daegu District Court Branch of the District Court (Seoul District Court) No. 527, 2012 62,44.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Rehabilitation Procedures 1 for Non-AbbBBB Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Non-AbbBB”) is limited to Non-AbBBB (hereinafter “Non-AbB”).
(1) On April 13, 2012, the company’s purpose is to manufacture and sell the steinty lease pipe, and the Gwangju District Court (hereinafter “Rehabilitation Court”) is only the rehabilitation court.
(2) On June 15, 2012, upon filing an application for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, the aforementioned court rendered a preservative measure order prohibiting the repayment of all debts to non-nbBBBBBBB, and a comprehensive injunction order prohibiting compulsory execution, etc. based on rehabilitation claims or rehabilitation security rights against the creditors of non-nbBBBBB. (2) On June 15, 2012, the rehabilitation court decided to commence rehabilitation proceedings against non-nbBBBBBB, and appointed A as a custodian.
B. On October 25, 2011, the Defendant supplied steel materials, etc. to the non-nbnb non-indicted 1 (e.g., a transfer security agreement between the Defendant and the non-nb non-indicted 1). On March 28, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract for the transfer of corporeal movables security on steel materials owned by the non-nbnb non-indicted 1, and on March 28, 2012, the contract for the transfer of claims for sales claims against the customer of non-nb bnb she entered into a rehabilitation security right (as of August 1, 2012, the Defendant reported the rehabilitation security right (as of August 1, 2012, KRW 18,893,506,035). On February 7, 2013, the rehabilitation court confirmed the settlement of the Defendant's non-nb bnb her as the rehabilitation security right to the non-indicted 12,0050,0900.
3) The Plaintiff’s rehabilitation plan based on the Defendant’s rehabilitation security right and rehabilitation claim based on the Defendant’s decision on the recommendation for reconciliation of this case (hereinafter “instant rehabilitation plan”).
Eul was prepared and submitted to the rehabilitation court, and on October 14, 2013.