All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the ground of appeal No. 1, the lower court, based on its stated reasoning, determined that the Plaintiff could not be deemed to have lent KRW 20,392,00 to G on November 1, 2005.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no violation of the rules of evidence, incomplete hearing, etc. as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. As to the ground of appeal No. 2, the lower court determined that it was difficult for the Plaintiff to recognize that the Plaintiff entered into a payment contract with G, as alleged by the Plaintiff.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of law such as violation of the rules of evidence and misunderstanding of legal principles as to payment contract in kind as alleged in the

3. As to the ground of appeal No. 3, this part of the ground of appeal is related to the determination of whether the court below's family register is appropriate, and the legitimacy of the argument cannot affect the conclusion of the judgment, and thus,

4. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.