Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 14,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Suwon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Nevertheless, at around 01:15 on June 14, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.192% of blood alcohol concentration, and even at the entrance of a leaf b K7 car, which is located in the Dongan-dong in the return dong at the time of harmony, the Defendant driven a car of 100 Ga 100 B K7.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident report, a situation report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the circumstantial statement of an employment driver, and an investigation report (report on the circumstances of an employment driver);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Records before judgment: Application of inquiries about criminal records, etc. and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for drunk driving as stated in its reasoning, committed the instant crime again. The Defendant, at the time of the instant crime, committed the instant crime, committed a traffic accident causing physical damage, resulting in a traffic accident causing the Defendant’s blood alcohol level, speech and behavior level, and traffic danger in light of the walking condition, is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant appears to have the attitude of recognizing and opposing the crime of this case, and that the defendant would not repeat the crime of this case by selling a vehicle used for the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no record of punishment for drinking driving for not less than 10 years from the time he was punished for drinking driving as stated in its reasoning, is favorable to the defendant.

The age, character and conduct, motive, circumstances, results and circumstances of the defendant, etc.