Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 25 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a doctor operating the “E Council member” in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, received a proposal from F members of the business of Pakistan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Pacific”) to the effect that “to provide economic benefits, such as cash, upon prescribing prescription drugs, such as pentlls, produced and sold in Pakistan,” and to comply with the proposal. On May 201, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from F in cash from F in the above clinic at the above clinic’s clinic’s clinic’s clinic’s clinic’s clinic on the same day and received KRW 737 million in total 18 times until June 2014, as indicated in the attached crime list.

As a result, the Defendant received 7,370,000 won provided for the purpose of promoting sales such as inducing to adopt medicines.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. F statement in the examination protocol of the suspect by the prosecution against the defendant

1. A copy of the statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. F statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. A copy of the F Statement;

1. The photograph of the request for withdrawal of shipment [1] The person who received rebates from an investigative agency to this court consistently as stated in the facts constituting a crime;

A statement is made, and the method of the payment of rebates has been made in detail and in detail, and ② under this law, F made a statement to the effect that “the request for withdrawal from the shipment is made and used for business expenses without using the money as rebates, but in the case of the Defendant, it is memory because it was clearly exchanged.” The Defendant clearly divided the hospital that paid rebates into the hospital that made the payment of rebates and the hospital that did not receive it (in light of investigation record 1069 pages), and in view of the balance between the Defendant and the F, it appears that there is no special reason to make a false statement to the Defendant unfavorable to the Defendant without the offering of rebates, and mistake is made.