Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around February 20, 2014, at a D agency operated by Pyeongtaek-si B, he/she opened his/her mobile phone under the name of the said C; and (b) was requested by said C to present his/her identification card.

The defendant presented that he completed the resident registration certificate of E in the name of Pyeongtaek-si in Gyeonggi-do, which is an official document in possession, as if the defendant was the resident registration certificate of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.

2. The Defendant: (a) forgeing a private document and uttering of a private document; and

The name, resident registration number, address, etc. of E shall be stated in the customer information column by using test-type fences in the paper of the application form for mobile phone entry at the time and place mentioned in the paragraph, and the name of E was stated in the applicant column at the bottom of the application form, and the signature of E was written next to the applicant column, and the above C knew that the forgery was forged was duly formed two copies of the forged mobile phone entry application form as mentioned above to the above C.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged two copies of a mobile phone entry application in the name of E, which is a private document on rights and duties, and exercised them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. An application for admission;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of resident registration certificates E;

1. Articles 231, 234, and 230 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination on the application of the sentencing criteria under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to the provisional payment order: It shall not be applicable;