Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. The status B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) is a juristic person established on December 19, 1969 for the purpose of construction business, and Pyeongtaek-si C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction”) received orders from E to KRW 326,40,000,000 of the construction cost from E, and is being executed from June 22, 2016.
F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) is a juristic person established for the purpose of construction business, and is a business owner performing the installation and cancellation of a workshop among the instant construction works by being awarded a contract for construction cost of KRW 429,070,000 from Defendant B.
G as a manager of H’s room, G is a business owner and a safety manager related to the work for raising other workshopss, who were awarded a subcontract of KRW 5,000,00 for construction cost from F to KRW 5,00,00 of the work cost during the instant work, and who actually performed the work for raising other workshops, as a member of H.
As a regular manager of F, the Defendant is a person in charge of overall control over the establishment and cancellation of a workshop at the site of the instant construction work.
The J is a general manager in charge of safety and health who manages the safety and health of the employees and contractors employed by the employees and contractors under Defendant B as a field manager at the construction site of this case.
B. The Parties’ duty of occupational care is a worker who has carried out an increase work of another workshop, and there was an occupational duty to comply with the work process or safety rules and to prevent accidents by doing work in accordance with manuals in order to prevent accidents.
G as a person responsible for the safety of the other company's increased work, the G is well examined as to whether workers comply with the work procedures and safety rules as stated in the work plan when the other company's increased work requiring high risk.